Product Brief
The client's concept in technical terms, with agreed acceptance criteria (function, technical, commercial, intended market)
RDR Global / RDR Manufacturing Group
Engr. Wendell K. Lomboy keeps the product concept, raw materials, formulation, prototype and production requirements technically aligned — from the first meeting until the product is approved and handed to production.
Proposed fee
₱50,000
per product or defined product family
Up to
3
prototype / revision cycles
Up to
5
technical meetings
Up to
30
days target development period
Fee proposed, final terms subject to agreement. 30-day target applies to technically feasible projects, subject to raw-material availability, manufacturer capacity, client response and testing requirements.
At a glance — nine questions, nine answers
§ 01Proposed role
Wendell serves as RDR's technical bridge between the client and RDR's manufacturing partners. Proposed title: Technical Product Development & Quality Consultant, RDR Manufacturing Group — engaged per product project.
Fig. 1 — Where the role sits
Manufacturing, QC testing and batch release stay with the manufacturer. Regulatory filings stay with the designated regulatory specialist. Branding, digital commerce and influencer work stay with Mika, Coach Josh and Yumi. Commercial decisions stay with RDR, and final product approval stays with the client.
See full scope boundaries§ 02Why RDR needs this role
RDR and the client see the finished product, but little of what went into it or how to make it again elsewhere.
RDR holds the brief, the specifications, the raw-material documents and the handoff package.
01
The client's idea becomes measurable product requirements before development starts — so revisions are about agreed criteria, not guesswork.
02
Ingredients are chosen for function, documentation, availability and cost — not price alone.
03
RDR works with the manufacturer best suited to each product instead of depending on one factory.
04
Documented specifications support scale-up or a second manufacturer when a product takes off.
“The manufacturer is responsible for making the product. My responsibility is to protect what the product is supposed to be — from what the client asked for, to what goes into it, to whether the next batch can be made the same way.”
§ 03What Wendell brings
I am also expanding my formulation capability through formal training and supervised project work with partner R&D teams.
§ 04Services
Seven functions that work together as one technical service — from the first brief to client representation in meetings.
1
Product briefing, technical feasibility, and written acceptance criteria agreed with the client
2
Ingredient and grade recommendations, specifications and alternatives, balancing function, documentation, availability and cost
3
Matching the product to the right manufacturer, briefing its R&D, and relaying requirements
4
Direct formulation within my competence; directing and supporting partner R&D for complex categories
5
Reviewing each prototype and the technical documents against the agreed criteria
6
Raw-material documentation review, specifications, and QC and retention-sample requirements for handoff
7
Technical point person in client meetings; explaining and defending technical decisions
Output
Nine written deliverables per project
| Area | My role |
|---|---|
| Client | Technical point person |
| Product | Brief, feasibility, requirements |
| Raw materials | Recommendation and document review |
| Manufacturer | Matching and technical coordination |
| Formulation | Direct or coordinated, depending on category |
| Prototype and revisions | Technical evaluation; consolidating feedback and relaying it to R&D |
| Quality | Specification and documentation review |
| Production | Technical handoff; monitoring within the agreed scope |
| Regulatory | Technical inputs to the designated regulatory specialist |
| Branding and packaging | Technical input to Mika, including packaging compatibility |
| Fulfillment | Coordination with the designated fulfillment lead |
§ 05Process & timeline
Ten stages from brief to production handoff, with up to three prototype / revision cycles inside a 30-day target development period.
Brief
Feasibility
Raw materials
Manufacturer match
Formulation
Prototype
Revisions (up to 3)
Max 3Client approval
Production handoff
Scale-up*
Separate*Second-manufacturer and scale-up work is a separate engagement.
Swipe table →
| Stage | Day 1 | Days 2–5 | Days 6–10 | Days 11–15 | Days 16–20 | Days 21–25 | Days 26–30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product brief | |||||||
| Technical feasibility | |||||||
| Raw materials + manufacturer | |||||||
| Prototype 1 | |||||||
| Review → Prototype 2 | |||||||
| Review → Prototype 3 (if needed) | |||||||
| Final review & approval |
Target development period: up to 30 days for technically feasible projects, subject to raw-material availability, manufacturer capacity, client response and testing requirements.
Stability, regulatory and other third-party testing timelines are separate.
§ 06Deliverables
Written outputs for every product project — so RDR holds the brief, the specifications, the raw-material documents and the handoff package.
The client's concept in technical terms, with agreed acceptance criteria (function, technical, commercial, intended market)
Recommended approach, technical risks, and whether specialist R&D or regulatory input is needed
Key materials, grades, functions, required documents and acceptable alternatives
Recommended manufacturer with capability fit, MOQ, indicative cost and lead time
Development brief to R&D, or my own formulation where within my competence
Technical assessment of each trial against the agreed criteria
Consolidated client feedback and decisions, logged per cycle
Checklist of COA, TDS, SDS, origin, batch and expiry/retest for key materials
Approved specifications, key process parameters, and QC and retention-sample requirements for production
§ 07Quality & manufacturing control
Making sure the intended quality can be understood, documented, reproduced, evaluated and maintained.
Fig. 2 — Raw-material documentation gate
Minimum
COA and TDS / specification for every key material
Preferred
SDS, country of origin, batch/lot, expiry or retest date
As relevant
Specific gravity, refractive index, viscosity, assay/purity, appearance, odor
Unusually low pricing or incomplete documentation is a reason to verify further — not an automatic rejection.
C1
Approved product and raw-material specs agreed at handoff
C2
Key process parameters documented with the manufacturer
C3
Manufacturer's QC results shared against the agreed specs
C4
Kept by the manufacturer as the physical reference
Different manufacturers use different equipment, batch sizes and material sources, so identical results are never automatic. With documented specifications, a controlled procedure, trial batches and comparison against retention samples, a qualified second manufacturer can be brought in while keeping the product within its approved specification. This is scoped as a separate engagement when needed.
§ 08Proposed fee
Technical Product Development & Quality Consulting, from product brief to client approval and production handoff.
₱50,000
per product or defined product family
Up to
3
prototype / revision cycles
Up to
5
technical meetings
Up to
30
day target period
The meeting and revision limits are scope controls. What the fee pays for is the technical responsibility for getting the product right.
Start with a product briefAdditional fees apply
One fee covers one product, or a family of variants built on substantially the same base formulation and process — for example, several perfumes on one base with different fragrances.
One project
Several perfumes on one base, different fragrances
Separate projects
Perfume · serum · sunscreen · laundry product
Upon confirmation of the product brief
Upon client approval or completion of the third revision cycle, whichever comes first
These are project costs paid separately:
§ 09RDR onboarding package
Current working onboarding concept: approximately ₱250,000+ per product, covering product development through launch. Final package pricing should be confirmed after each workstream's scope and commercial structure are finalized.
Working figures vs. ≈ ₱250,000 concept
₱230,000 of ₱250,000
| Workstream | Lead | Working figure discussed |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Product Development & Quality | Wendell | ₱50,000 (proposed) |
| Branding & Packaging | Mika | ₱55,000 |
| Digital Commerce / Fulfillment | Coach Josh | ₱100,000 |
| Influencer / KOL | Yumi | ₱25,000 |
| Management & Program Direction | RDR | To be set by RDR |
Decision 1
At the working figures above, the four specialist workstreams already account for most of ₱250,000. RDR may prefer a higher package price or tiered pricing by product complexity rather than compressing any single workstream.
Decision 2
Manufacturing, raw materials, packaging components, printing, testing, regulatory fees and logistics are separate from the onboarding package, and this should be stated clearly to every client.
Decision 3
Regulatory coordination and fulfillment each need one named owner, so the client gets one answer on each.
§ 10Safeguards
Protections that should be in writing before the first project.
Between RDR and me, RDR and each manufacturer, and RDR and each client — covering formulations, specifications and client information.
Clients remain RDR clients. Clients and manufacturers should not deal directly with each other outside RDR on RDR projects.
Clear ownership of formulations developed by me, by the manufacturer, or jointly — and whether they can be transferred to a second manufacturer.
Final terms subject to legal review.
Risk
Raw-material quality
Safeguard
Documentation gate: COA and TDS minimum for key materials; further verification when documents or pricing raise questions
Risk
Manufacturer capacity
Safeguard
Capacity checked at matching; qualified secondary manufacturers developed as volume grows
Risk
Scope and revisions
Safeguard
Written acceptance criteria; 3 revision cycles and 5 meetings per project; a change of product type or brief is a new project
Risk
Confidentiality and bypassing
Safeguard
NDA, non-circumvention and IP terms signed before development begins
§ 11Scope boundaries
I am not the manufacturer, the QA/QC department, the regulatory consultant or the legal adviser, and I do not take responsibility for manufacturing defects or batch release decisions. My responsibility is the technical direction, evaluation and coordination described in this proposal.
§ 12Proposed next steps
“I would rather start with a clear, well-defined scope that works than promise more than the system can deliver on day one.”
Approve role
Approve the role in principle
Boss RDR / Boss Wendy
Confirm scope & fee
Confirm scope, product-family definition and ₱50,000 fee for the pilot
Boss RDR / Boss Wendy with Wendell
Identify manufacturing partners
Identify initial manufacturing partners by category
Wendell; RDR approves
Finalize legal safeguards
Put NDA, non-circumvention and IP agreements in place
RDR with legal counsel
Pilot with first client
Run the first client product through the process
Wendell with Boss Wendy
Review after 1–3 projects
Review time, fee, timeline and results after 1–3 projects; refine the model
All
§ 13Client inquiry
Inquiry review
RDR reviews your idea and category.
Initial product briefing
Your concept becomes technical requirements with written acceptance criteria.
Brief confirmed
Proposed: 50% of the fee upon confirmation of the product brief.
Development begins
After NDA, non-circumvention and IP terms are signed.